Triple

T100022
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject LL.M. E2019 entity
Predicate recognizedIn P4733 FINISHED
Object many legal systems worldwide LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: many legal systems worldwide | Statement: [LL.M., recognizedIn, many legal systems worldwide]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recognizedIn
Context triple: [LL.M., recognizedIn, many legal systems worldwide]
  • A. recognizedFor
    Indicates that one entity is acknowledged, credited, or honored for a particular achievement, quality, contribution, or work associated with another entity.
  • B. recognizedAs
    Indicates that one entity is acknowledged or accepted as having the identity, role, status, or classification of another entity.
  • C. recognizedRight
    Indicates that an agent formally acknowledges and accepts that another party possesses a specific right or entitlement.
  • D. recognizedLanguage
    Indicates that an entity has identified, detected, or acknowledged a particular language as being used or present.
  • E. formOfRecognition
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as an official acknowledgment, honor, or validation granted to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24d4862f881908cc8b89d3a78031d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:04 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a253b95d4c81909d1f2bc37e799c44 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24ebfc5a88190bdd1653b9fa541fe completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:11 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a253b869448190bd75a3542806b36c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:09 a.m.