Statements (34)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:legal_case |
gptkbp:argued_on |
March 29, 2000
March 28, 2000 |
gptkbp:case_number |
99-7000
|
gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
|
gptkbp:consequences |
influenced standards for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 28, 2000 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_David_Souter
|
gptkbp:docket_number |
99-7000
|
gptkbp:held_in |
The Court held that the state court's decision was contrary to federal law.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Williams v. Taylor
|
gptkbp:impact |
Influenced standards for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:John_Taylor
Ronald Williams Virginia Taylor |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:529_U._S._420
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
federal habeas corpus law
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
ineffective assistance of counsel
Ineffective assistance of counsel |
gptkbp:outcome |
reversed and remanded
Reversed the decision of the lower court. |
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Strickland_v._Washington
subsequent habeas corpus cases |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
Williams v. Taylor, 529 U. S. 420 (2000)
|
gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Strickland_v._Washington
|
gptkbp:significance |
established standards for federal habeas corpus review
Clarified the application of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. |
gptkbp:significance_in_legal_history |
important for understanding state vs. federal court roles
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Pryor_vs._Hinton
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|