|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
legal case
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
5-4 ruling
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:futurePlans
|
potential for similar laws in other states
|
|
gptkbp:historical_analysis
|
public policy
social justice
civil rights
federalism
human rights
judicial independence
advocacy
constitutional law
judicial review
legal challenges
legal reform
state legislation
political implications
social movements
women's rights
political strategy
legal precedent
reproductive rights
litigation strategy
judicial activism
legal ethics
state power
constitutional interpretation
feminist legal theory
public health implications
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
abortion access
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Kagan
Justice Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:legalStatus
|
gptkb:Center_for_Reproductive_Rights
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
abortion rights
challenges to state abortion laws
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Texas_Senate_Bill_8
gptkb:Texas_House_Bill_1515
|
|
gptkbp:mediaCoverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
upheld_Texas_law
|
|
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation
|
gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health
gptkb:Greg_Abbott
|
|
gptkbp:politicalParty
|
gptkb:Justice_Barrett
gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Kavanaugh
gptkb:Justice_Gorsuch
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt
|
|
gptkbp:publicAccess
|
protests
support for abortion rights
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization
|
|
gptkbp:state
|
gptkb:Texas
|
|
gptkbp:yearEstablished
|
December 10, 2021
|