Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
GPTKB entity
Statements (96)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:advocacy |
pro-choice advocacy groups
pro-life advocacy groups |
gptkbp:case_analysis |
analysis by legal experts
|
gptkbp:case_number |
21-588
preceded by lower court rulings 21-50792 |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
set precedent for future cases influenced public policy impact on women's health services led to increased activism influenced public health policy influenced state-level legislation influenced judicial appointments influenced women's health rights influenced legal interpretations of state versus federal powers influenced legal interpretations of bodily autonomy affects women seeking abortions influenced federal abortion policy influenced legal interpretations of privacy rights influenced reproductive health access upheld Texas Senate Bill 8 upheld controversial provisions influenced legal strategies of abortion rights advocates influenced legal strategies of anti-abortion advocates influenced legal interpretations of constitutional rights influenced legal interpretations of women's rights. decision by the Supreme Court upheld restrictions on abortion |
gptkbp:case_significance |
significant for reproductive rights
significant for reproductive health rights |
gptkbp:case_types |
constitutional law case
arguments presented by both sides |
gptkbp:consequences |
influenced state abortion laws
implications for future abortion cases |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
civil case |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer dissent from some justices |
gptkbp:duration |
ongoing legal battles since 2021
|
gptkbp:economic_policy |
public policy implications
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
December 10, 2021
|
gptkbp:government_response |
Texas legislature response
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for |
future abortion legislation
|
gptkbp:historical_context |
history of abortion laws in the U. S.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
|
gptkbp:impact |
reproductive rights
|
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health
gptkb:Greg_Abbott |
gptkbp:is_debated_in |
sparked national debate on abortion
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
judicial review of state laws
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
United States federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
part of ongoing abortion debate
abortion law in Texas |
gptkbp:legal_framework |
controversial judicial outcome
impact on lower courts legal framework for abortion rights |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:federal_government
state sovereignty constitutional rights abortion rights arguments about federal oversight arguments about state rights |
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
upheld Texas Senate Bill 8
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Texas state government
State of Texas represented by Attorney General Whole Woman's Health represented by attorneys Whole Woman's Health organization |
gptkbp:legal_scholars_opinion |
debate among legal scholars
|
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Texas_Senate_Bill_8
abortion restrictions in other states |
gptkbp:material |
background of the case
challenged Texas abortion law |
gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive media coverage
|
gptkbp:outcome |
Supreme Court allowed Texas law to remain in effect
upheld Texas law |
gptkbp:precedent |
legal precedent for future cases
related to Roe v. Wade affects future abortion cases |
gptkbp:public_perception |
majority opinion written by Justice Alito
|
gptkbp:public_reaction |
controversial ruling
controversial public opinion |
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey gptkb:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization |
gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Texas_Senate_Bill_8
|
gptkbp:significance |
impact on abortion access in Texas
impact on abortion access |
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Justice_Amy_Coney_Barrett
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito |
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|