Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

GPTKB entity

Statements (96)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:advocacy pro-choice advocacy groups
pro-life advocacy groups
gptkbp:case_analysis analysis by legal experts
gptkbp:case_number 21-588
preceded by lower court rulings
21-50792
gptkbp:case_outcome 5-4 ruling
set precedent for future cases
influenced public policy
impact on women's health services
led to increased activism
influenced public health policy
influenced state-level legislation
influenced judicial appointments
influenced women's health rights
influenced legal interpretations of state versus federal powers
influenced legal interpretations of bodily autonomy
affects women seeking abortions
influenced federal abortion policy
influenced legal interpretations of privacy rights
influenced reproductive health access
upheld Texas Senate Bill 8
upheld controversial provisions
influenced legal strategies of abortion rights advocates
influenced legal strategies of anti-abortion advocates
influenced legal interpretations of constitutional rights
influenced legal interpretations of women's rights.
decision by the Supreme Court
upheld restrictions on abortion
gptkbp:case_significance significant for reproductive rights
significant for reproductive health rights
gptkbp:case_types constitutional law case
arguments presented by both sides
gptkbp:consequences influenced state abortion laws
implications for future abortion cases
gptkbp:court gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
civil case
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
dissent from some justices
gptkbp:duration ongoing legal battles since 2021
gptkbp:economic_policy public policy implications
gptkbp:effective_date December 10, 2021
gptkbp:government_response Texas legislature response
gptkbp:has_implications_for future abortion legislation
gptkbp:historical_context history of abortion laws in the U. S.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
gptkbp:impact reproductive rights
gptkbp:involved_parties gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health
gptkb:Greg_Abbott
gptkbp:is_debated_in sparked national debate on abortion
gptkbp:judicial_review judicial review of state laws
gptkbp:jurisdiction United States federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legal_context part of ongoing abortion debate
abortion law in Texas
gptkbp:legal_framework controversial judicial outcome
impact on lower courts
legal framework for abortion rights
gptkbp:legal_issue gptkb:federal_government
state sovereignty
constitutional rights
abortion rights
arguments about federal oversight
arguments about state rights
gptkbp:legal_outcome upheld Texas Senate Bill 8
gptkbp:legal_representation Texas state government
State of Texas represented by Attorney General
Whole Woman's Health represented by attorneys
Whole Woman's Health organization
gptkbp:legal_scholars_opinion debate among legal scholars
gptkbp:legislation gptkb:Texas_Senate_Bill_8
abortion restrictions in other states
gptkbp:material background of the case
challenged Texas abortion law
gptkbp:media_coverage extensive media coverage
gptkbp:outcome Supreme Court allowed Texas law to remain in effect
upheld Texas law
gptkbp:precedent legal precedent for future cases
related to Roe v. Wade
affects future abortion cases
gptkbp:public_perception majority opinion written by Justice Alito
gptkbp:public_reaction controversial ruling
controversial public opinion
gptkbp:related_cases gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey
gptkb:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization
gptkbp:related_to gptkb:Texas_Senate_Bill_8
gptkbp:significance impact on abortion access in Texas
impact on abortion access
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Justice_Amy_Coney_Barrett
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5