Statements (37)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
gptkbp:applicationNumber |
SJC-09012
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
administrative law
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
447 Mass. 1
|
gptkbp:community_engagement |
voter registration process
|
gptkbp:controversy |
attorneys for both sides
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Judicial_Court_of_Massachusetts
majority opinion |
gptkbp:date |
June 2006
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
2006
|
gptkbp:gameFeatures |
Reilly
Whitmer |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Whitmer v. Reilly
|
gptkbp:impact |
increased scrutiny of voter ID laws
voter access policies |
gptkbp:judges |
state election laws
Justice's_dissent Justices_of_the_Supreme_Judicial_Court |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
voter registration
equal protection under the law |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Massachusetts_Attorney_General's_Office
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
election integrity
constitutionality of voter ID laws state versus federal election laws |
gptkbp:legislation |
Massachusetts_voter_ID_law
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
shaped future legislation
summary of legal findings legal scholars' reviews affects on future elections Mass._1_(2006) |
gptkbp:outcome |
upheld state law
court_ruled_in_favor_of_Reilly |
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Bush_v._Gore
influenced future voter registration cases |
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Reilly_v._Massachusetts
|
gptkbp:significance |
impact on election law
|
gptkbp:soundtrack |
March 2006
|