|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:advocacy
|
marine conservation
|
|
gptkbp:australia's_argument
|
Japan's whaling violates international law
|
|
gptkbp:australia's_evidence
|
scientific studies
|
|
gptkbp:australia's_goal
|
end commercial whaling
|
|
gptkbp:australia's_legal_action
|
initiated in 2010
|
|
gptkbp:australia's_legal_strategy
|
focus on environmental law
|
|
gptkbp:australia's_legal_victory
|
significant for marine life
|
|
gptkbp:australia's_position
|
protection of whales
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
Japan must cease whaling activities
binding on Japan
whaling not necessary for research
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
future whaling cases
|
|
gptkbp:conservation_efforts
|
strengthened by ruling
|
|
gptkbp:court's_analysis
|
scientific validity of whaling
|
|
gptkbp:court's_decision_impact
|
whale conservation efforts
|
|
gptkbp:court's_ruling_significance
|
landmark case in environmental law
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2014
|
|
gptkbp:environmental_impact
|
whale populations
|
|
gptkbp:future_prospects
|
whaling policies globally
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Whaling in the Antarctic case
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
whaling regulations
|
|
gptkbp:international_relations
|
affected by ruling
strengthened with conservation groups
|
|
gptkbp:international_response
|
support for ruling
|
|
gptkbp:involved_countries
|
gptkb:Australia
gptkb:Japan
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:international_law
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_compliance
|
monitored by international bodies
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_defense
|
whaling is for scientific research
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_international_obligations
|
to protect marine species
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_international_reputation
|
affected by ruling
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_justification
|
gptkb:cultural_heritage
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_legal_strategy
|
defend whaling practices
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_position
|
cultural significance of whaling
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_response
|
revised whaling program
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_whaling_fleet
|
operated in Antarctic waters
|
|
gptkbp:japan's_whaling_fleet_size
|
reduced after ruling
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
whaling practices
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
disputes between states
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
gptkb:international_law
uphold international law
|
|
gptkbp:major_issues
|
scientific whaling
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
global attention
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Japan's whaling program was found to be not for scientific purposes
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
international environmental law
environmental protection cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
conservation of marine life
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
against whaling
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
Antarctic region
|
|
gptkbp:research
|
debated topic
|
|
gptkbp:scientific_community's_consensus
|
whaling is unnecessary
|
|
gptkbp:scientific_community's_view
|
whaling is not justified
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
whaling practices
|
|
gptkbp:treaty
|
gptkb:International_Convention_for_the_Regulation_of_Whaling
|
|
gptkbp:whale_species_involved
|
gptkb:minke_whale
fin whale
humpback whale
|
|
gptkbp:whaling_debate
|
ongoing issue
|
|
gptkbp:whaling_methods
|
controversial
|
|
gptkbp:whaling_regulations
|
enforced by international agreements
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:ICJ
gptkb:international_law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|