gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:argument_presented_by
|
gptkb:U._S._Solicitor_General
gptkb:Texas_Attorney_General
|
gptkbp:case_filed_on
|
August 2021
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
Part of ongoing immigration litigation
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
Decided
5-4 decision
Sets precedent for future cases
Dissent argues for federal discretion
Majority opinion supports state authority
Rejection of Biden's immigration plan
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
Influences immigration policy debates
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
Civil case
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
Challenges to federal authority
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
21-588
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
June 30, 2022
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Texas (2022)
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:State_of_Texas
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
597 U. S. ___ (2022)
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
Executive actions on immigration
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
Challenges to executive actions
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
Reaffirmation of state rights
State vs. federal power dynamics
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Immigration policy
Federal government overreach
State standing to sue
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
Reinstatement of lower court ruling
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
Biden administration legal team
Texas legal team
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Deferred_Action_for_Childhood_Arrivals_(DACA)
Restricts DACA implementation
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
Extensive coverage
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Court ruled against the Biden administration
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Influences future immigration cases
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
Controversial ruling
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Texas_v._United_States_(2016)
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Impact on immigration enforcement
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|