United States v. Stewart

GPTKB entity

Statements (55)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:case_analysis analyzed in law reviews
analysis of the outcome conducted
studied in legal education
gptkbp:case_number summary available online
appealed from district court
documents filed in court
details published in legal journals
04-1234
gptkbp:case_outcome gptkb:majority_opinion
affirmed
upheld conviction
reviewed by legal scholars
impact on legal practices
details of the outcome discussed
ruling issued by the court
summary of the outcome available
gptkbp:case_significance important for future appeals
analysis of the case's significance conducted
gptkbp:case_types appeal
arguments made during the case
gptkbp:consequences implications for defendants
consequences for the appellant
gptkbp:court gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:Judge
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion dissenting opinion present
gptkbp:docket_number 2004-1234
gptkbp:effective_date gptkb:2004
April 20, 2004
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. Stewart
gptkbp:impact sentencing reform
gptkbp:is_cited_in 123 F.3d 456
2004 U. S. App. LEXIS 12345
gptkbp:is_standardized_by harmless error
gptkbp:judicial_review appellate review
gptkbp:jurisdiction federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legal_arguments_presented arguments presented by both sides
gptkbp:legal_context federal criminal procedure
gptkbp:legal_framework gptkb:United_States_federal_law
gptkbp:legal_issue criminal law
ineffective assistance of counsel
gptkbp:legal_outcome affirmed lower court ruling
gptkbp:legal_principle due process
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:lawyer
gptkbp:outcome conviction upheld
gptkbp:precedent influential case
established legal standards
gptkbp:propulsion gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Stewart
gptkbp:related_cases gptkb:United_States_v._Booker
gptkbp:significance impact on sentencing guidelines
gptkbp:sound March 15, 2004
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Tenth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5