United States v. Seiko Epson Corporation
GPTKB entity
Statements (77)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_International_Trade
|
gptkbp:applies_to |
gptkb:California
January 1, 2018 |
gptkbp:case_types |
1:16-cv-00001
3:18-cv-00001 |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
gptkb:Seiko_Epson_Corporation gptkb:United_States |
gptkbp:date |
gptkb:2018
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Seiko Epson Corporation
|
gptkbp:impact |
market competition
|
gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:legislation
gptkb:award gptkb:Police_Department gptkb:Seiko_Epson_Corporation gptkb:United_States gptkb:Federal_Trade_Commission gptkb:sports_event gptkb:stock_market_index gptkb:technique gptkb:legal_case consumer protection corporate governance legal compliance court proceedings dispute resolution evidence presentation legal representation regulatory oversight judicial review monopolistic practices expert witnesses trade regulations anti-competitive behavior price fixing market share legal documentation antitrust law witness testimony judicial decisions market dynamics legal arguments market regulation settlement negotiations legal analysis legal implications economic implications antitrust enforcement court filings legal strategy litigation process legal ramifications business implications market implications economic damages regulatory implications corporate implications business ramifications corporate ramifications economic ramifications market ramifications regulatory ramifications |
gptkbp:is_a_solution_for |
gptkb:document
|
gptkbp:judging_criteria |
final judgment
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
antitrust laws
|
gptkbp:major_city |
$10 million
|
gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:Settlement
|
gptkbp:related_to |
consumer electronics
price fixing inkjet printers laser printers printer market |
gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2016
|