Statements (49)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Affected police search procedures
Search conducted without warrant Search was lawful |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law
80-2020 |
gptkbp:citedBy |
456 U.S. 798
|
gptkbp:court |
6-3 decision
Affirmed lower court ruling Affirmed the decision of the lower court Decision based on probable cause Majority opinion emphasized public safety. |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
May 16, 1982 |
gptkbp:filedIn |
January 19, 1982
|
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Appealed from lower court
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Ross
|
gptkbp:impact |
Law_enforcement_practices
|
gptkbp:involved |
United_States,_Ross
|
gptkbp:judges |
Justice Harry Blackmun
Established legal standards Majority opinion supported by 6 justices Dissent argued against majority ruling Influenced future rulings Supreme_Court_review |
gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
Fourth Amendment
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Search warrant necessity
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional interpretation
Search and seizure law Automobile exception Set precedent for vehicle searches Clarified vehicle search protocols Guided by constitutional law Impacts on civil liberties Fourth_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
Cited in future cases
Relevant to law enforcement training Examined search and seizure laws Important Fourth Amendment case Involved drug trafficking Involved warrantless search of vehicle Influenced_Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence |
gptkbp:outcome |
Search and seizure upheld
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
|
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Carroll_v._United_States
Search incident to arrest |
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:California_v._Acevedo
|
gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:United_States_v._Chadwick
|
gptkbp:significance |
Clarified search warrant requirements
|