Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
warrantless searches violate the Fourth Amendment
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analysis of the Supreme Court's decision
analysis of the ruling's effects relevant to Fourth Amendment discussions |
| gptkbp:case_number |
20-590
details of the search incident history of lower court decisions summary of the case's background and ruling |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
shaped future legal standards
impact on future legal interpretations details of the Supreme Court's ruling ruled in favor of Ramirez |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for civil liberties
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
arguments regarding search and seizure |
| gptkbp:consequences |
implications for law enforcement practices
impact on civil rights protections influenced future cases on search warrants |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
June 15, 2021
reversed lower court ruling |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
affects police conduct
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Ramirez
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Ramirez |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
141 S. Ct. 2291
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
judgment delivered by the court
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justices of the Supreme Court
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
reviewed by Supreme Court
reviewed under constitutional standards |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
context of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
context of the legal arguments presented |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
constitutional law
decision made by the court outcome of the judicial review process |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
arguments presented by both sides
Fourth Amendment rights principles established by the ruling |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
warrant requirement upheld
affirmed the need for warrants |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
exclusionary rule
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Police_Department
examined constitutional protections |
| gptkbp:material |
involved illegal search
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
reaffirmed the necessity of warrants
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
cited in future cases
established guidelines for law enforcement impact on police searches |
| gptkbp:public_interest |
high-profile case
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Alito
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
|
| gptkbp:significance |
significant for constitutional law
clarified search and seizure laws |
| gptkbp:sound |
March 2, 2021
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|