Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
appealed_to_the_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
reinstated gun rights
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
21-11001
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2023-01-06
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
part of domestic violence legal framework
part of ongoing gun rights debate |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Rahimi
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
gun ownership rights
domestic violence protections |
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
Zachary Rahimi |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Jerry_E._Smith
gptkb:Judge_Stephen_A._Higginson gptkb:Judge_Don_R._Willett Judge_Higginson's_dissent |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
constitutional implications
federal vs state law interpretation_of_the_Second_Amendment |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
clarification of legal standards reaffirmation of individual rights Domestic Violence Prevention Act Federal Firearms Act affects domestic violence policy affects gun control debates potential for future cases Second_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
important for legal scholars
important for civil liberties important for constitutional law important for gun rights advocates important for domestic violence advocates important for future litigation important for policymakers important for public discourse important for the judiciary |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversal of lower court decision
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Judge_Smith's_majority_opinion
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
implications for gun control laws
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
mixed reactions
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
District_of_Texas_case
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on domestic violence laws
|