United States v. Qualcomm Incorporated
GPTKB entity
Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
gptkb:Ninth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
Qualcomm appealed the decision |
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
used in case studies
detailed case analysis available |
| gptkbp:case_number |
extensive case documentation available
18-cv-00146-LHK |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
upheld by appellate court
Qualcomm's business practices scrutinized permanent injunction against Qualcomm set to influence future cases |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
significant antitrust case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
far-reaching legal ramifications
affects future antitrust cases |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_of_America
gptkb:United_States_District_Court gptkb:Qualcomm_Incorporated |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
May 21, 2019
|
| gptkbp:duration |
over a year
highly complex case |
| gptkbp:economic_impact |
higher prices for mobile devices
|
| gptkbp:future_prospects |
future implications for antitrust law
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
affects global tech companies
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Qualcomm Incorporated
|
| gptkbp:impact |
affects the semiconductor industry
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_competition |
reduced competition in the market
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_qualcomm |
significant impact on Qualcomm's business model
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Qualcomm_Incorporated |
| gptkbp:is_debated_in |
anti-competitive practices
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Judge Lucy Koh
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
subject to judicial review
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:law_firms_involved |
multiple law firms
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
based on antitrust legal framework
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
antitrust violations
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Police_Department
analyzed by legal scholars extensive legal analysis conducted Qualcomm's legal team |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Clayton_Act
gptkb:Sherman_Act |
| gptkbp:major_city |
not reached
|
| gptkbp:market_share |
dominant market share in mobile chipsets
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
widely covered in the press
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Qualcomm found to have violated antitrust laws
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
important legal precedent established
sets precedent for antitrust enforcement |
| gptkbp:public_interest |
consumer welfare
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
mixed reactions
|
| gptkbp:publication_year |
January 2018
|
| gptkbp:regulatory_compliance |
increased regulatory scrutiny on Qualcomm
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
FTC v. Qualcomm
|
| gptkbp:related_news |
ongoing litigation
|
| gptkbp:stakeholders |
various stakeholders in tech industry
|
| gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
internal Qualcomm documents
|
| gptkbp:witnesses |
economists
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Atlantic_Coast_Line_Railroad_Company
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|