United States v. Postmates Inc.
GPTKB entity
Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
none
|
| gptkbp:approves |
court approved
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
19-cv-12345
|
| gptkbp:claims |
employee status
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
high
|
| gptkbp:condition |
compliance with labor laws
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:United_States_District_Court gptkb:Postmates_Inc. unfair labor practices denied allegations favorable to plaintiffs upheld employee classification |
| gptkbp:date |
2019
|
| gptkbp:duration |
approximately 1 year
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
January 1, 2019
|
| gptkbp:filingLocation |
civil
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
greater protections
revised employment contracts |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Postmates Inc.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
worker rights
influenced other gig companies |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Postmates_Inc. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
employment classification
employee vs. independent contractor |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
federal labor law
gig economy regulation |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:California_Assembly_Bill_5
influenced state laws. |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
significant
legal scholars landmark case widely discussed publicly available undisclosed used in law schools amicable settlement future gig economy cases ongoing debates on gig work revisions to employment practices shaped future regulations |
| gptkbp:outcome |
settlement
settled out of court changed business practices |
| gptkbp:precedent |
impact on gig economy
|
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
worker classification
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:California
gptkb:Uber_Technologies,_Inc._v._Berwick gptkb:California_v._Postmates_Inc. |
| gptkbp:tactics |
contractor status
|