gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
civil case
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:date
|
1913-12-08
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
gptkb:No._1
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
1914-01-12
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.
|
gptkbp:impact
|
railroad regulation
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
234 U. S. 1
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Charles_Evans_Hughes
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White
gptkb:Justice_Benjamin_N._Cardozo
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
gptkb:Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day
gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
gptkb:Justice_Edward_Douglass_White
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan_II
Justice William Howard Taft
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
early 20th century antitrust movement
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
antitrust laws
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
monopolistic practices
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Act
gptkb:Clayton_Antitrust_Act
gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
ruling against the railroad
|
gptkbp:party
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Missouri_Pacific_Railroad_Company
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
influenced future antitrust cases
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.
gptkb:United_States_v._American_Tobacco_Co.
gptkb:United_States_v._Google_LLC
gptkb:Northern_Securities_Co._v._United_States
gptkb:United_States_v._AT&_T_Co.
gptkb:United_States_v._E._I._du_Pont_de_Nemours_and_Company
|
gptkbp:significance
|
established standards for competition
important case in U. S. antitrust law
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:1914
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Taft_Court
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|