Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
gptkb:District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil case
available in legal databases summary available online involves multiple plaintiffs part of ongoing cannabis litigation |
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced public opinion on marijuana
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
15-15056
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2016-08-16
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Mc Intosh
|
| gptkbp:impact |
state rights
|
| gptkbp:is_a_basis_for |
constitutional rights
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
833 F.3d 1160
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
Mc Intosh |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Richard_R._Clifton
gptkb:Judge_Mary_M._Schroeder gptkb:Judge_Paul_J._Watford |
| gptkbp:judging_criteria |
judgment entered in favor of Mc Intosh
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:government_agency
Controlled Substances Act medical marijuana federal government overstepped authority Congressional intent regarding marijuana enforcement |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:political_movement
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Cole_Memorandum
|
| gptkbp:material |
involves medical marijuana dispensaries
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Gonzales_v._Raich
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
resolved
affirmed lower court's ruling set precedent for future cases reversed and remanded limited federal intervention reaffirmed state rights favorable to defendants affects cannabis industry examines federal vs. state law important for cannabis law influenced federal policy on marijuana enforcement upheld protections for medical marijuana users |
| gptkbp:precedent |
federal enforcement of marijuana laws
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on state medical marijuana laws
|