Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
conviction overturned
impacts on legal practices influenced future fraud cases interpreted by legal experts significant legal ruling various outcomes discussed |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal case
89-404 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
483 U.S. 350
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court unanimous decision established precedent |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 24, 1990 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
March 27, 1990
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
part of legal history
|
| gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
landmark case in fraud law
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. McNally
|
| gptkbp:impact |
subsequent legislation
federal fraud prosecutions |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
reversed Supreme_Court_review |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
defense attorney
federal law beyond a reasonable doubt mail fraud prosecutor reversal of lower court's decision reduced scope of mail fraud specific intent required for mail fraud |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
summary available in legal databases
analyzed in legal studies documented in legal archives often studied in law schools cited in legal opinions details published in law reviews important for legal interpretation relevant to criminal law relevant to legal scholars subject to critique in legal forums |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed conviction
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:John_McNally |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent mail fraud cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Skilling_v._United_States
gptkb:McNally_v._United_States implications for future cases contextualized in legal discussions |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
honest services fraud
|
| gptkbp:significance |
narrowed interpretation of the mail fraud statute
|
| gptkbp:team |
influenced legislation changes
|