Statements (70)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
13-297 |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
June 30, 2014 |
gptkbp:docket_number |
2013-297
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Loving
|
gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:military_officer
military courts |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
134 S. Ct. 2061
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Loving |
gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
due process
military justice equal protection |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
government attorney
Loving's attorney |
gptkbp:material |
gptkb:historical_event
gptkb:television_channel gptkb:majority_opinion gptkb:legal_case judicial independence legal challenges appeal process legal accountability legal standards military discipline judicial interpretations judicial precedents precedent cases dissenting opinions constitutional questions future cases judicial opinions legal implications military personnel rights testimony in court public reaction legal ramifications court's reasoning evidence presented legal precedents cited military justice reforms Supreme Court's authority legal reforms proposed legal arguments presented jury's decision legal scholars' analysis impact on military families Supreme Court's role appeal to Supreme Court Loving's conviction for murder Loving's defense arguments Supreme Court's deliberation government's prosecution judicial system evaluation military justice history military law evolution |
gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:United_States_v._Mc_Clain
gptkb:United_States_v._Mc_Carthy |
gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
upheld conviction affirmed the lower court's ruling military law precedent |
gptkbp:precedent |
military law cases
|
gptkbp:significance |
impact on military justice system
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Windsor
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|