|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
yes
possible
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
compliance with regulations
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
ongoing
legal experts
public record
complaint
|
|
gptkbp:case_focus
|
market share
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
available online
confidential
public record
1:21-cv-00001
20-cv-12345
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:Roman_settlement
active
industry standards
pending
regulatory changes
scheduled
to be determined
ongoing review
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome_expectation
|
favorable for plaintiff
|
|
gptkbp:case_participants
|
government and corporation
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
high profile
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
civil
civil case
commercial dispute
|
|
gptkbp:clinical_trial
|
2022-05-15
to be announced
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
gptkb:business_practices
broad
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:California
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
gptkb:Lattice_Semiconductor_Corporation
|
|
gptkbp:court_hearing
|
scheduled
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
gptkb:2021
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:defendant_industry
|
gptkb:technology
|
|
gptkbp:defense
|
business justification
|
|
gptkbp:discovery
|
ongoing
|
|
gptkbp:duration
|
ongoing
|
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
gptkb:significant
|
|
gptkbp:enforces
|
gptkb:Federal_Trade_Commission
|
|
gptkbp:historical_period
|
2020-2022
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
market competition
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Lattice_Semiconductor_Corporation
|
|
gptkbp:is_applied_in
|
gptkb:Police_Department
|
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by
|
monopoly power
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
antitrust law
antitrust regulations
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
antitrust laws
anti-competitive practices
antitrust violations
anticipated
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
pending appeal
pending resolution
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Police_Department
private law firm
private law firms
conducted by law firms
|
|
gptkbp:litigation_strategy
|
to be developed
|
|
gptkbp:litigation_type
|
federal litigation
|
|
gptkbp:major_city
|
possible
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
pending
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
antitrust litigation
antitrust enforcement
antitrust cases
future antitrust litigation
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
mixed
|
|
gptkbp:publication_year
|
2020-12-01
January 2021
|
|
gptkbp:regulatory_compliance
|
increased
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft_Corporation
other antitrust cases
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:Company
|
|
gptkbp:resolution
|
pending resolution
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_status
|
not settled
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
scheduled
|
|
gptkbp:stakeholders
|
gptkb:investors
consumers
competitors
regulators
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
market analysis
|
|
gptkbp:witnesses
|
economists
to be determined
|