United States v. Karo

GPTKB entity

Statements (51)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseTypes criminal case
No. 82-1340
gptkbp:citedBy gptkb:U.S._Supreme_Court
468 U.S. 705
gptkbp:controversy use of tracking devices
gptkbp:court gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
limited government surveillance powers
majority opinion emphasized privacy
tracking device use requires warrant
expanded_interpretation_of_Fourth_Amendment
gptkbp:date March 20, 1984
gptkbp:decidedBy 1984
gptkbp:historicalEvent involved drug trafficking investigation
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. Karo
gptkbp:impact influenced public policy on surveillance
law_enforcement_practices
gptkbp:is_involved_in gptkb:United_States_government
defendant_Karo
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Blackmun
reversed lower court decision
concerns over law enforcement effectiveness
Supreme_Court_review
gptkbp:legal_principle expectation of privacy
Fourth_Amendment_rights
gptkbp:legal_representation defense attorney
government attorney
gptkbp:legalStatus constitutional law
search and seizure
important for civil liberties
Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence
gptkbp:legislation Electronic Communications Privacy Act
gptkbp:notableFeature law enforcement accountability
impact on digital privacy
examined balance between security and privacy
influenced future surveillance laws
affected future legislation on tracking devices
critical in digital age privacy discussions
landmark decision on privacy rights.
ongoing debates on surveillance
shaped legal standards for privacy
tracking device without warrant unconstitutional
gptkbp:outcome set precedent for future cases
affirmed privacy protections
reinforced need for warrants in surveillance
warrantless search deemed unconstitutional
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_Brennan
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
established limitations on police surveillance
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
gptkbp:significance impact on privacy rights