United States v. Jones dissent
GPTKB entity
Statements (64)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Fourth Amendment case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced future cases on surveillance
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
January 23, 2012
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor protection against unreasonable searches impact on civil liberties expanded interpretation of privacy rights impact on individual freedoms impact on law enforcement practices impact on marginalized communities potential for abuse of power need for legislative action balancing security and privacy importance of judicial oversight judicial interpretation of the Fourth Amendment importance of digital literacy in privacy protection importance of community engagement in privacy discussions concerns over technological advancements need for critical analysis of surveillance technologies future implications for technology and law government overreach in surveillance historical context of privacy rights historical precedents in privacy law impact of globalization on privacy rights impact of privacy violations on society impact of social media on privacy expectations impact of surveillance on mental health impact of surveillance on personal relationships importance of civil rights advocacy importance of constitutional protections importance of informed consent in data collection importance of international human rights standards importance of public trust in law enforcement need for accountability in surveillance practices need for clarity in legal definitions need for clear legal standards need for comprehensive privacy legislation need for education on privacy rights need for ethical considerations in technology use need for proactive measures in privacy advocacy need for public discourse on privacy issues need for transparency in government actions need for warrant in digital tracking potential for chilling effects on free speech public expectations of privacy relationship between technology and privacy role of technology companies in privacy issues role of technology in law enforcement role of the Supreme Court in protecting rights importance of historical awareness in privacy debates need for interdisciplinary approaches to privacy law |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Jones dissent
|
| gptkbp:major_issues |
GPS tracking without a warrant
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed lower court decision
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
limitations on government surveillance
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Kyllo_v._United_States
gptkb:Riley_v._California |
| gptkbp:significance |
privacy rights in the digital age
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|