|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
gptkb:none
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
law school curriculum
|
|
gptkbp:casualties
|
gptkb:Sir_Ronald_Reagan
|
|
gptkbp:charging_method
|
attempted assassination
|
|
gptkbp:civic_engagement
|
increased awareness of mental health issues
|
|
gptkbp:clinical_trial
|
gptkb:District_of_Columbia
gptkb:cultural_landmark
approximately 6 weeks
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
changes in trial procedures
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:John_Hinckley_Jr.
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:cultural_impact
|
inspired films and books
|
|
gptkbp:current_status
|
released under supervision
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
March 30, 1981
|
|
gptkbp:defense
|
public defender
|
|
gptkbp:evaluates
|
schizophrenia diagnosis
|
|
gptkbp:family
|
dysfunctional upbringing
|
|
gptkbp:federal_involvement
|
gptkb:Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
political climate of the 1980s
|
|
gptkbp:historical_significance
|
impact on future cases
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Hinkley
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
changes in legal standards for insanity defense
media portrayal of mental illness
|
|
gptkbp:influenced
|
shaping public perception of insanity defense
|
|
gptkbp:is_motivated_by
|
obsession with Jodie Foster
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Barrington_D._Parker
12 jurors
not guilty by reason of insanity
unanimous verdict
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
Supreme Court involvement
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
gptkb:lawyer
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
scholarly articles
high-profile attorneys
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Insanity_Defense_Reform_Act_of_1984
insanity defense reform
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
|
gptkbp:media_appearances
|
documentaries and news specials
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:mental_health_evaluation
|
multiple assessments
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
commitment to mental health facility
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Hinkley standard
|
|
gptkbp:psychological_treatment
|
long-term therapy
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
divided
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
controversial
|
|
gptkbp:public_speaking
|
debate on mental health and crime
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
John W. Hinckley Jr. v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:release_conditions
|
supervised release
|
|
gptkbp:safety
|
gun control debates
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
insanity defense in legal system
|
|
gptkbp:state
|
gptkb:District_of_Columbia_police
|
|
gptkbp:strategy
|
insanity plea
|
|
gptkbp:subsequent_hearings
|
periodic reviews
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:1982
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|