|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
no appeal filed
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
court records
20-1234
ongoing litigation
1:21-cv-12345
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
industry standards
settlement agreement
resolved
favorable to plaintiff
business practices change
|
|
gptkbp:case_resolution_date
|
2021-09-15
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
gptkb:government_policies
gptkb:cultural_landmark
gptkb:legal_case
corporate regulation
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
civil case
|
|
gptkbp:clinical_trial
|
not scheduled
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
business conduct regulations
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Harman_International_Industries
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2021-09-15
March 2021
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2021
gptkb:Judge
|
|
gptkbp:defense
|
lack of market power
|
|
gptkbp:discovery
|
completed
|
|
gptkbp:duration
|
8 months
|
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
gptkb:Acoustic
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
2021-09-20
June 2021
|
|
gptkbp:future_prospects
|
regulatory scrutiny
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Harman International
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:business_practices
mergers and acquisitions
market competition
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Harman_International_Industries
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:Harman_International_Industries
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_basis_for
|
gptkb:Sherman_Act
|
|
gptkbp:is_monitored_by
|
third-party monitor
|
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
affirmed
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith
Judge Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
possible appeal
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal jurisdiction
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
antitrust framework
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
antitrust laws
none reported
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
gptkb:Roman_settlement
compliance agreement
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
market competition
consumer welfare
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Police_Department
private law firm
antitrust implications
Harman International's counsel
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Clayton_Act
|
|
gptkbp:litigation_strategy
|
aggressive defense
|
|
gptkbp:major_city
|
$50 million
confidential
business practices review
court approved
ongoing prior to resolution
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
high profile
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
gptkb:Roman_settlement
appeal decision
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
yes
antitrust enforcement
future antitrust cases
related antitrust cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
consumer protection
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
issued by DOJ
|
|
gptkbp:publication_year
|
2021-01-10
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft
gptkb:United_States_v._Apple
gptkb:United_States_v._Google
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
mergers and acquisitions
|
|
gptkbp:resolution
|
amicable settlement
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_conditions
|
compliance with antitrust laws
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_duration
|
5 years
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
antitrust enforcement
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
2021-08-01
|
|
gptkbp:stakeholders
|
shareholders
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
financial documents
|
|
gptkbp:witnesses
|
economists
fact witnesses
|