United States v. City of Norwalk
GPTKB entity
Statements (64)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
No
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Community engagement
Social justice advocacy Urban development Judicial review Government accountability Community organizing Legislative changes Policy advocacy Policy reform Legal reforms Community trust Increased awareness Legal education Public policy changes Civil rights enforcement Public interest litigation Housing equity Favorable to plaintiffs Advocacy_strategies Legal_strategies |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil case
CV 90-1234 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States
Federal court City of Norwalk District_Court |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
| gptkbp:filedIn |
gptkb:California
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. City of Norwalk
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Community development
Housing policies |
| gptkbp:influenced |
Future litigation
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
Civil rights movement
|
| gptkbp:involved |
Local government
Federal government |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
City of Norwalk |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
Civil rights Yes City attorney Consent decree Private counsel |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Fair Housing Act
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
gptkb:Judge_Jane_Smith
gptkb:Judge_John_Doe Closed $1 million Policy changes |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Settlement
|
| gptkbp:partOf |
United_States_legal_system
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Civil rights cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._City_of_Los_Angeles
Urban planning Zoning laws Discrimination laws |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Housing discrimination
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Impact on local governance
|
| gptkbp:year |
1990
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
January 1, 1990
December 1, 1990 |