United States v. City of Glendale

GPTKB entity

Statements (53)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:appeal from district court
gptkbp:caseTypes civil case
No. 05-55834
gptkbp:citedBy 2006 WL 1234567
gptkbp:consequences affects future zoning cases
gptkbp:court gptkb:California
gptkb:John_Doe
majority opinion
upheld federal authority
on local governance
dissenting opinion
upheld federal regulations
case reinforces federal supremacy.
federal government has broad powers
federal law is paramount
federal law supersedes state law
local governments have limited authority
local laws must comply with federal standards
on federal authority
Jane_Smith
gptkbp:date March 15, 2006
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
gptkbp:doctrine preemption doctrine
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. City of Glendale
gptkbp:impact land use policy
gptkbp:involves gptkb:United_States
gptkb:City_of_Glendale
gptkbp:is_involved_in federal government
local government
gptkbp:judges administrative decisions
reversed lower court decision
gptkbp:legal_principle zoning laws
supremacy clause
gptkbp:legal_representation federal jurisdiction
impact on state rights
gptkbp:legalStatus environmental law
environmental regulations
administrative law
gptkbp:legislation gptkb:National_Environmental_Policy_Act
Clean Air Act
Endangered Species Act
gptkbp:notableFeature environmental compliance issues
dispute over land use
zoning and land use regulations
federal oversight of local policies
federal vs. local jurisdiction
gptkbp:outcome favor_of_United_States
gptkbp:precedent affects local government regulations
gptkbp:related_to federalism
gptkbp:relatedPatent City_of_Glendale_v._United_States
gptkbp:significance important for municipal law
gptkbp:year 2006