|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
court case
|
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome
|
promoted fair competition
favorable to the government
limited railroad monopolies
|
|
gptkbp:caseTypes
|
No. 1
civil case
antitrust case
federal case
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
January 12, 1914
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:historicalContext
|
Progressive Era
early 20th century America
|
|
gptkbp:historicalSignificance
|
set precedent for future cases
influenced public policy
landmark_case_in_U.S._legal_history
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
transportation industry
railroad industry
|
|
gptkbp:involved
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Baltimore_and_Ohio_Railroad_Company
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day
gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis
gptkb:Justice_William_Howard_Taft
gptkb:Justice_John_H._Clarke
gptkb:Justice_Edward_Douglass_White
|
|
gptkbp:legalStatus
|
gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Justice
market competition
antitrust laws
affirmed lower court ruling
restraint of trade
dissolution of monopolistic practices
enforced antitrust laws
monopolistic_practices
Baltimore_and_Ohio_Railroad's_attorneys
|
|
gptkbp:notableEvent
|
gptkb:Hepburn_Act
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Act
Clayton Antitrust Act
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
increased regulation
reduced monopolistic power
ruling against the railroad
strengthened_antitrust_enforcement
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
future antitrust cases
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:United_States_v._American_Tobacco_Co.
gptkb:Northern_Securities_Co._v._United_States
gptkb:United_States_v._Standard_Oil_Co.
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
Sherman Antitrust Act
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on railroad regulation
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
1914
|