Statements (91)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
School District
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
Affirmed lower court.
District_Court. |
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
2023-12345
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Summary of the legal implications.
Summary of the legal precedent. Summary of the legal significance. Summary of the legal analysis. Summary of the legal arguments. Summary of the legal outcome. Affects future patent litigation. Details of the legal arguments. Ruling in favor of the plaintiff. Summary of the legal representation. Summary of the legal review. Court_found_in_favor_of_the_patent_holder. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil case.
12,345,679 Addressed key legal issues in patent law. Details of the legal representation. Legal representation for both parties. Legal review of the appellate decision. |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
F.3d
US_13,456,789_F4 US_14,567,890_F5 |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Affects patent litigation strategies.
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
Infringement of patent.
Validity of patent. |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:description |
This case involves a dispute over patent rights.
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
March 15, 2021
|
| gptkbp:hasLegalEvent |
Details of the legal precedent.
Details of the legal review. |
| gptkbp:hasLegalStatus |
Details of the legal analysis.
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Appealed from lower court ruling.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
US 12,345,679 F3
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced patent law.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Judge A
Judge B Judge C Judge D Judge E |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Intellectual Property
Law Firm X Law Firm Y Patent infringement Claim construction. Doctrine of equivalents. Set a standard for patent claims. Patent_law_in_the_United_States. |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Judgment affirmed.
Closed. Analyzed patent validity. Involves complex patent issues. Involves patent rights and infringement. Judicial review of patent claims. Key case in patent law. Relevant to patent law. Reviewed by appellate court. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Affirmed
The court upheld the lower court's ruling. |
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
Defendant
Plaintiff |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Judge A
Judge B Judge C |
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
Clarified patent eligibility. Influenced future patent applications. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:US_10,987,654_F1
gptkb:US_11,234,567_F2 Details of the legal context. Summary of the legal context. Impacts future patent applications. Context_within_U.S._patent_law. |
| gptkbp:significance |
Important for future patent cases.
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
December 1, 2022
|
| gptkbp:team |
Set a legal precedent for future cases.
Details of the legal significance. Details of the legal outcome. Established legal principles for patent law. Legal arguments presented by both parties. Legal implications for future patent cases. Legal outcome favorable to the plaintiff. Significant for patent law development. Legal_analysis_of_patent_infringement. |
| gptkbp:year |
2023
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
January 15, 2023
|