Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
public discourse
freedom of the press affirmed lower court ruling |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil case
|
| gptkbp:court |
7-2 decision
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
involves public interest
involves constitutional law involves legal precedent involves emotional distress claims involves a hostage situation involves a magazine article involves a play and its portrayal involves celebrity status involves civil rights involves false light claims involves federal law interpretation involves journalistic integrity involves media accountability involves media ethics involves media representation involves privacy rights involves public figure status involves state law claims involves_First_Amendment_protections |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Time, Inc. v. Hill
|
| gptkbp:impact |
public figure doctrine
media reporting standards |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_court_system
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
actual malice standard
385 U.S. 374 First_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
influenced media law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruled_in_favor_of_Time,_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:James_Hill
gptkb:Time,_Inc. |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent defamation cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Gertz_v._Robert_Welch,_Inc.
gptkb:New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
defamation law
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established standards for public figures in defamation cases
|
| gptkbp:year |
1967
|