Statements (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
Design movement
|
| gptkbp:advocatesFor |
Social reform
|
| gptkbp:associatedWith |
gptkb:William_Morris
|
| gptkbp:criticism |
Industrial design practices
|
| gptkbp:focus |
Aesthetic improvement
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
The Design Reform Movement
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Modern design principles
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
Graphic design
Product design Interior_design |
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
gptkb:Arts_and_Crafts_Movement
|
| gptkbp:keyIssues |
Sustainability
Craftsmanship Social responsibility User-centered design Simplicity in design Artistic integrity Design as a means of communication Revival of traditional crafts Design for social change Community involvement in design Functionality in design Historical context in design Integration of art and industry Aesthetic education Design for accessibility Cultural significance of design Cultural heritage in design Public engagement with design Beauty in everyday objects Design as a catalyst for change Interdisciplinary collaboration in design Collaboration between artists and designers Design as a cultural narrative Design as a form of expression Design as a reflection of identity Design as a reflection of society Design as a tool for empowerment Design critique and theory Emphasis on handmade goods Ethical considerations in design Global influences on local design practices Historical preservation in design Impact of design on lifestyle Influence on contemporary design movements Innovation in traditional practices Promotion of local materials Rejection of mass production Role of technology in design evolution Aesthetic_value_in_utility |
| gptkbp:notableFigures |
gptkb:C._R._Ashbee
John Ruskin Christopher_Dresser |
| gptkbp:origin |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:promoted |
Functional design
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Aesthetic_Movement
|
| gptkbp:resultedIn |
Design education reforms
|
| gptkbp:timePeriod |
19th century
|