Statements (38)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
from district court
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil rights case
99-4010 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
41 F.3d 205
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:City_of_Cleveland
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit Sutton_family |
| gptkbp:date |
July 26, 2000
March 8, 2000 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2000
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Sutton v. City of Cleveland
|
| gptkbp:impact |
employment law
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:City_of_Cleveland
Sutton |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Merritt
gptkb:Judge_Boggs gptkb:Judge_Clay summary judgment |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
disability discrimination
definition of disability |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defendant's attorney
plaintiffs' attorney |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
employment discrimination
influenced future disability cases clarified_ADA_definitions |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990
|
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:Cleveland,_Ohio
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
interpretation of 'substantially limits'
disability rights advocacy precedent for future cases impact_on_ADA_interpretation influence_on_Supreme_Court_decisions |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed in part, reversed in part
employment opportunities for disabled |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Bragdon_v._Abbott
Toyota_Motor_Manufacturing,_Kentucky,_Inc._v._Williams |