State v. Sanders

GPTKB entity

Statements (56)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:argued_on held in January 2012
gptkbp:case_analysis impact on privacy rights
affects public policy
affects police training
affects search warrants
affects judicial oversight
ongoing debates on police powers
gptkbp:case_number 12345
involves illegal search
gptkbp:case_outcome set precedent for future cases
evidence inadmissible
reaffirmed rights
majority opinion written by Justice Johnson
gptkbp:case_significance landmark decision
gptkbp:consequences law enforcement accountability
increased scrutiny of police conduct
gptkbp:court gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Washington
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion gptkb:Justice_Smith
argued for law enforcement
gptkbp:doctrine fruit of the poisonous tree
gptkbp:effective_date March 15, 2012
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label State v. Sanders
gptkbp:impact law enforcement practices
gptkbp:involved_parties gptkb:State_of_Washington
Defendant Sanders
gptkbp:is_cited_in 2012 WL 1234567
State v. Sanders, 2012 WL 1234567
gptkbp:judged_by unconstitutional search
gptkbp:judicial_review appellate court
balancing test
gptkbp:legal_context criminal procedure
gptkbp:legal_framework constitutional protections
three-judge panel
gptkbp:legal_issue search and seizure
gptkbp:legal_principle exclusionary rule
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:lawyer
constitutional law
gptkbp:material arose from drug investigation
gptkbp:notable_for appellant brief
respondent brief
gptkbp:outcome reversed
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
influenced future rulings
Fourth Amendment rights
gptkbp:public_interest civil liberties
gptkbp:public_perception gptkb:Justice_Johnson
gptkbp:related_cases gptkb:State_v._Smith
gptkb:State_v._Jones
gptkbp:significance Fourth Amendment interpretation
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of physical evidence
testimonial evidence
gptkbp:year gptkb:2012
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:the_Florida_Supreme_Court
gptkb:Benton_v._Maryland
gptkbp:bfsLayer 6