|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
No. 10-1234
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
gptkb:defense_strategies
sentencing guidelines
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Doe
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
April 20, 2010
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
State v. Martinez
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:State_of_New_Mexico
gptkb:defendant_Martinez
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
2010 WL 1234567
123 N. M. 456
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
guilty
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
appellate court
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
criminal procedure
New Mexico law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
criminal law
insufficient evidence
improper jury instructions
ineffective assistance of counsel
exclusion of evidence
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
self-defense
due process
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
public defender
|
|
gptkbp:notable_quote
|
" Justice must be served."
" The law is the law."
" Every case is unique."
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
conviction upheld
|
|
gptkbp:post-conviction
|
appeal filed
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Roe
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
gptkb:media_coverage
community response
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:State_v._Smith
gptkb:State_v._Johnson
influenced legislation
impact on future trials
cited in appeals
|
|
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis
|
case studies
legal textbooks
law review articles
|
|
gptkbp:sentence
|
5 years imprisonment
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
March 15, 2010
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
gptkb:video
forensic evidence
witness testimony
|
|
gptkbp:witnesses
|
expert witness
character witness
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2010
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:the_Florida_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|