State v. Hill

GPTKB entity

Statements (48)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:appeal insufficient evidence
from lower court
by the defendant
gptkbp:caseTypes criminal case
No. 12345
gptkbp:citedBy 2008 WL 2051040
State_v._Hill,_2008_WL_2051040
gptkbp:claims defendant was the aggressor
gptkbp:community_engagement high profile case
gptkbp:court gptkb:State_of_Washington
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Washington
Hill
acted in self-defense
based on statutory interpretation
found defendant guilty
gptkbp:decidedBy affirmed
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label State v. Hill
gptkbp:impact influenced future self-defense cases
gptkbp:judges guilty
three judges
reversed in part
one judge dissented
Supreme_Court_review
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:Washington
gptkbp:legal_principle self-defense
reasonable belief of imminent harm
gptkbp:legal_representation public defender
gptkbp:legalStatus preponderance of evidence
held in 2008
Washington_State_law
gptkbp:media_coverage extensive coverage
gptkbp:notableFeature reviewed by legal scholars
affects future self-defense claims
clarified self-defense laws
involved a shooting incident
summarized in legal journals
important for criminal law
gptkbp:outcome conviction upheld
upheld conviction
upheld lower court's ruling
gptkbp:politicalParty two judges concurred
gptkbp:precedent cited in subsequent cases
established self-defense standards
gptkbp:research testimony of witnesses
gptkbp:tactics malicious intent
justifiable use of force
gptkbp:year 2008