Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
C0-88-1944 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
441 N.W.2d 793
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Minnesota
State of Minnesota exclusionary rule Hennum |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1990
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
fruit of the poisonous tree
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appeal from lower court
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
criminal charges
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. Hennum
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal procedure
future legal cases |
| gptkbp:judges |
affirmed
Justices_of_the_Minnesota_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Minnesota
|
| gptkbp:keyPeople |
admissibility of evidence
published opinion |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
admissible evidence
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
Fourth_Amendment_implications |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
evidence handling |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
gptkb:Minnesota_Supreme_Court
court records legal reasoning evidence collection criminal justice system evidence admissibility precedent for future cases impact on civil liberties search warrant requirements criminal procedure review law_enforcement_practices Fourth_Amendment_interpretation |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
upheld conviction legal precedent established affirmation of lower court ruling legal affirmation |
| gptkbp:precedent |
search and seizure law
search and seizure standards |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:State_v._Johnson
|
| gptkbp:research |
physical evidence
|
| gptkbp:tactics |
unlawful search
lawful search |
| gptkbp:voiceCast |
oral argument
|