|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
12345
available online
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
active
ongoing
pending
to be determined
followed
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:clinical_trial
|
2022-10-15
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
high stakes
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:New_York
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
unfair competition
|
|
gptkbp:court_filings
|
numerous
|
|
gptkbp:damage
|
monetary compensation
|
|
gptkbp:date_enacted
|
gptkb:2020
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:defendant_claims
|
no infringement
|
|
gptkbp:diameter
|
long
|
|
gptkbp:discovery
|
completed
|
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
gptkb:significant
|
|
gptkbp:filing_type
|
civil
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Spectrum Case
|
|
gptkbp:impact_on_trademark_law
|
notable
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:Spectrum_Brands
gptkb:intellectual_property
|
|
gptkbp:is_applied_in
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
commercial
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Smith
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
gptkb:complex
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
gptkb:complex
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:lawyer
ongoing
retained
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
Trademark Act
|
|
gptkbp:litigation_costs
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:litigation_timeline
|
lengthy
|
|
gptkbp:major_city
|
ongoing
undisclosed
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:next_hearing
|
2022-06-01
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
pending
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
important
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
varied
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
made by parties
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
precedent case
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
trademark infringement
|
|
gptkbp:resolution
|
gptkb:unknown
|
|
gptkbp:revenue
|
$400
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
2021-05-01
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
documents
witness testimony
|
|
gptkbp:witnesses
|
industry experts
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:The_Mirage
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|