|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:area
|
civil law
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
21-1234
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
affirmed lower court
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2021
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Doe
|
|
gptkbp:doctrine
|
reasonable person standard
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
gptkb:2021
April 20, 2021
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Smith v. Eklund
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
influences tort law
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Smith
gptkb:Eklund
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
contract dispute
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
123 U. S. 456
Smith v. Eklund, 123 U. S. 456 (2021)
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
damages
causation
breach of duty
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
negligence
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
Eklund's attorney
Smith's attorney
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
to be determined
plaintiff wins
|
|
gptkbp:party
|
gptkb:Smith
gptkb:Eklund
|
|
gptkbp:plot_summary
|
negligence case involving duty of care.
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
future cases
establishes duty of care
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Roe
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Doe_v._Eklund
Jones v. Smith
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
March 15, 2021
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Eklund_vs._Ward_I
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|