Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
administrative law
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
[2005] HCA 48
dealt with the legality of detention of asylum seekers. |
| gptkbp:context |
post-September 11 immigration policies
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2005
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
15 June 2005
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
influenced judicial attitudes towards immigration law
set precedents for future refugee cases |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Ruddock v. Taylor
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
(2005) 222 CLR 612
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
unanimous decision
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Gummow J
Gleeson CJ Kirby J Callinan J Hayne J Mc Hugh J |
| gptkbp:key_issues |
refugee status determination
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
affirmed the legality of certain detention practices
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
judicial review of administrative decisions
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
discussed in law journals
Australian Government Solicitor Taylor's legal team examined in case law textbooks |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Migration_Amendment_(Excision_from_Migration_Zone)_Act_2001
gptkb:Migration_Act_1958 refugee policy in Australia |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the decision of the lower court
upheld the legality of the Minister's decisions |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:propulsion |
Philip Ruddock
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
controversial among human rights advocates
supported by some political groups |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
cited in later immigration law cases
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Al Masri |
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:John_Taylor
|
| gptkbp:significance |
highlighted issues of executive power
impact on immigration law in Australia raised questions about judicial independence |
| gptkbp:sound |
March 2005
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Lewis_vs._Ruddock_I
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|