Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
possible
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
12345
civil litigation |
| gptkbp:claims |
$100,000
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
contract enforcement
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Los_Angeles
Rogers Nelson 2023-09-10 to be determined civil court followed pending appeal lawyer A lawyer B ruling on motion for summary judgment ruling on motion to dismiss |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
court
|
| gptkbp:description |
dispute over contract terms.
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
2022-12-15
|
| gptkbp:hasPublications |
expert A
expert B |
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
ongoing litigation
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Rogers vs. Nelson
|
| gptkbp:impact |
significant
|
| gptkbp:involves |
Rogers
Nelson |
| gptkbp:isExploredIn |
completed
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
witness A witness B |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
ongoing
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
contract law
law firm B presented by both sides awaiting verdict. may set precedent law_firm_A |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:movement |
motion to dismiss
motion for summary judgment |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
high profile
not reached |
| gptkbp:outcome |
pending
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
case law X
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
high
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
case Y
|
| gptkbp:research |
document X
document Y |
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2023-05-01
|
| gptkbp:status |
active
|
| gptkbp:treaty |
ongoing
|
| gptkbp:year |
2023
|