Statements (78)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
the case was appealed to the House of Lords.
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed in law schools.
became a significant part of case law on press freedom. analyzed in contemporary legal studies. had implications for future legal cases. often used as a case study in law. remains relevant in discussions of free speech. |
| gptkbp:case_interpretation |
subject to various interpretations.
|
| gptkbp:case_law_development |
contributed to the development of case law.
|
| gptkbp:case_law_relevance |
relevant in current case law discussions.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
a key event in legal history.
well-documented in legal archives. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
influenced future case outcomes.
the court's decision was controversial. the outcome was seen as a triumph for democracy. the ruling was seen as a victory for civil rights. |
| gptkbp:case_relevance_today |
remains relevant today.
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
significant in the context of press rights.
significant in today's legal landscape. |
| gptkbp:case_study_relevance |
remains a relevant case study.
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
had far-reaching legal implications.
had significant legal ramifications. had significant political implications for the monarchy. |
| gptkbp:context |
arose from the publication of seditious libel.
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:John_Wilkes
gptkb:King_George_III gptkb:King's_Bench |
| gptkbp:cultural_impact |
the case had a lasting cultural impact.
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
contributed to the doctrine of parliamentary privilege.
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
analyzed in historical studies.
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
reflected the tensions of the time.
set against a backdrop of political unrest. part of the struggle for civil liberties in England. |
| gptkbp:historical_documentation |
documented in historical records.
|
| gptkbp:historical_figure |
John Wilkes was a prominent political figure.
|
| gptkbp:historical_legacy |
left a legacy for future generations.
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
considered a landmark case in English law.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. Wilkes
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced later cases on libel.
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
had a profound impact on journalism.
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
(1763) 4 Burr 2527.
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
the court ruled in favor of Wilkes.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_authority_today |
affirms judicial authority in modern law.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_impact_today |
continues to have judicial impact today.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
significant in the context of judicial review.
the case involved issues of judicial review. the opinion emphasized the need for a free press. the reasoning was influential in legal thought. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:England
|
| gptkbp:legal_discourse |
a key topic in legal discourse.
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
highlighted the court's role in protecting rights.
taught in legal education. the case affirmed judicial authority. the case had a lasting judicial impact. contributed to the legal framework surrounding libel. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
focused on the right to publish without censorship.
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Wilkes' acquittal was celebrated by supporters.
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of the press
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
John Wilkes was represented by counsel.
studied extensively by legal scholars. |
| gptkbp:legislation |
influenced the development of the Libel Act.
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
received extensive media coverage.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Wilkes was acquitted
led to changes in libel law. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established important legal precedent.
established judicial precedent for future cases. set a precedent for the protection of journalists. |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
the case garnered significant public attention.
|
| gptkbp:public_speaking |
shaped public discourse on civil liberties.
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
R v. Woodfall
influenced subsequent cases on freedom of expression. |
| gptkbp:significance |
established precedent for press freedom
recognized the importance of free speech. |
| gptkbp:strategy |
argued for the necessity of free expression.
|
| gptkbp:year |
1763
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:King's_Bench_Prison
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|