R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly
GPTKB entity
Statements (64)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
gptkb:Administrative_Law
Administrative law |
| gptkbp:case_number |
[2001] UKHL 26
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Quashed the decision of the Secretary of State
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Constitutional law case
Public law case Human rights case |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Reinforced the role of the judiciary in protecting rights
Contributed to the development of human rights law in the UK Influenced the training of prison staff on legal rights Stimulated research on prison conditions and rights Influenced international human rights standards regarding prisoners Highlighted the balance between security and rights Promoted the importance of legal representation for prisoners Promoted the establishment of oversight bodies for prisons Encouraged advocacy for prisoners' rights Influenced public policy on incarceration Influenced subsequent legislation Promoted awareness of legal rights among prisoners Shaped legal discourse on prisoners' rights Stimulated discussions on prison reform Fostered collaboration between legal and human rights organizations Encouraged legal challenges to administrative decisions Encouraged the development of legal frameworks for prison management Facilitated the emergence of legal aid for prisoners Encouraged the establishment of prisoner advocacy groups |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:London
gptkb:United_Kingdom |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Prisoners' rights
Administrative justice |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Subsequent legal cases
[2001] UKHL 26 |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
2001-05-16
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Hope
gptkb:Lord_Brown gptkb:Lord_Bingham gptkb:Lord_Rodger gptkb:Lord_Steyn gptkb:Lord_Hutton |
| gptkbp:key_issues |
Prisoners' rights
Right to fair procedure |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Clarified the scope of judicial review
Reinforced the importance of procedural fairness Emphasized the need for transparency in decision-making |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Proportionality in law
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Government legal team
Daly's legal team |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Decision in favor of the appellant
Judgment in favor of Daly |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set precedent for future cases
Influenced future cases on prisoners' rights |
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:John_Daly
Daly |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
R (on the application of A) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
R (on the application of M) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department |
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Impact on prison law
Impact on prison regulations |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2001
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Lord_Justice_Thomas_Bingham
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|