R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
GPTKB entity
Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
public interest
government accountability fair trial rights due process legal remedies executive power judicial interpretation impact on immigration law judicial oversight proportionality test statutory interpretation right to liberty impact on civil liberties impact on public policy impact on legal standards impact on legislation impact on judicial review standards impact on policy impact on human rights advocacy impact on legal practice impact on asylum law impact on detention policies impact on executive discretion remedies for unlawful detention |
| gptkbp:case_number |
2003/0001
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
judicial review
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
public law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2004
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2004-11-10
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
|
| gptkbp:impact |
human rights law
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
[2004] UKHL 56
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
appeal allowed
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Hoffmann
gptkb:Lord_Hope gptkb:Lord_Scott gptkb:Lord_Bingham gptkb:Lord_Rodger |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
UK immigration law |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
immigration detention
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
principle of legality
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
appellant's counsel
respondent's counsel |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Immigration_Act_1971
gptkb:Human_Rights_Act_1998 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
unlawful detention
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influential case
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2)
|
| gptkbp:sound |
2004-07-14
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|