Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
appeal against conviction
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
implications for future legislation
part of case law history discussed in law schools analyzed for legal precedents implications for marital rights influenced UK law |
| gptkbp:case_number |
documented in legal archives
summarized in legal textbooks [1991] UKHL 12 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
landmark ruling
reviewed by legal scholars set a precedent for future cases impact on public policy upheld by higher court |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
significant for women's rights
recognized marital rape as a crime |
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:1991
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
some judges dissented
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
doctrine of consent
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
1980s feminist movement
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. R (1991)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
cited in legal arguments
[1991] 1 AC 447 |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
majority decision
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Slynn
gptkb:Lord_Keith gptkb:Lord_Mustill gptkb:Lord_Browne-Wilkinson gptkb:Lord_Ackner |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
common law
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
part of UK legal framework
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
marital rape
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
consent in marriage
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
analyzed in legal journals
defendant represented by counsel prosecution represented by counsel |
| gptkbp:modern_relevance |
gender equality in law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
marital rape is a crime
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
widely discussed in media
|
| gptkbp:reform |
reform of sexual offenses law
|
| gptkbp:significance |
changed legal precedent
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Royal_Courts_of_Justice
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|