Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
implied rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 9)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
public discourse
public policy social justice judicial independence public interest government accountability campaign finance laws judicial review legal reforms civil liberties freedom of expression political participation rights of citizens legal precedents media freedom election integrity government transparency political accountability voter engagement constitutional interpretation political equality political rights political advertising regulations democratic_processes law_enforcement_practices |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J unanimous decision Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
proportionality test
freedom of political communication |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Australian_constitutional_law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the law
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales gptkb:Aust_v._Commonwealth |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|