Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:area |
constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 5)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Australian_electoral_law
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J unanimous decision Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
public interest
freedom of expression freedom of political communication regulation of political advertising |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Australian_Constitution
implied rights political communication rights democratic_governance Section_24_of_the_Constitution Section_7_of_the_Constitution |
| gptkbp:outcome |
influenced public policy
upheld the law examined the balance of rights reaffirmed democratic principles set a precedent for future legislation strengthened constitutional protections addressed electoral fairness affirmed the validity of laws clarified the scope of political communication considered the role of government |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Nationwide_News_Pty_Ltd_v_Wills
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation gptkb:Australian_Capital_Television_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales gptkb:Theophanous_v_Herald_&_Weekly_Times_Ltd |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case
|