Statements (42)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
S202/2014
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:date |
2015-08-04
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
doctrine of implied rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 49)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
on campaign finance laws
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J Gordon_J_dissent Nettle_J_dissent |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
constitutionality of electoral funding laws |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
represented by various barristers
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
public interest
freedom of expression democratic participation electoral integrity campaign finance regulation political communication rights Australian_constitutional_law |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the validity of laws
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Gageler J majority
Bell_J_majority French_CJ_majority Gordon_J_majority Keane_J_majority Kiefel_J_majority Nettle_J_majority |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:Australian_Capital_Television_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth gptkb:Unions_NSW_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2015-05-06
|