Statements (43)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law
administrative law electoral law |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
majority decision |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 47)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced public policy
shaped political discourse affected campaign finance laws informed legal interpretations revised electoral regulations |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J some judges dissented Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
validity of electoral laws |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
represented by barristers
involved solicitors |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Australian_Constitution
State law public interest freedom of speech judicial review election integrity voter rights political communication campaign regulations political funding democratic_principles Commonwealth_law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the law
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact_on_Australian_electoral_law
|