Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law
administrative law electoral law |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
majority decision |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 45)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced public policy
contributed to legal discourse on democracy affected campaign finance laws raised awareness of political communication rights shaped electoral reform |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:dissent_by_Nettle_J
gptkb:French_CJ gptkb:Gageler_J gptkb:dissent_by_Gordon_J Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
constitutionality of electoral funding laws |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
appellant represented by counsel
respondent represented by counsel |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
considered public interest
discussed role of the judiciary addressed political equality analyzed government regulation analyzed influence of money in politics analyzed political accountability assessed political participation considered ethical implications of funding considered implications for democracy debated electoral fairness debated limits of political expression discussed campaign transparency discussed electoral integrity evaluated judicial review examined constitutional guarantees examined freedom of speech examined role of political parties explored rights of citizens scrutinized legislative intent part_of_Australian_constitutional_law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the validity of laws
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:McCloy_v._New_South_Wales
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|