Statements (49)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:area |
constitutional law
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil rights case
landmark case administrative law case appeal case public law case constitutional challenge freedom of speech case freedom of expression case constitutional interpretation case judicial review case electoral law case judicial activism case judicial restraint case political law case |
gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 44)
|
gptkbp:impact |
political campaign financing
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J unanimous decision Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of expression
freedom of political communication validity of electoral funding laws political communication rights |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
electoral integrity
campaign finance regulation public interest in elections freedom of political communication doctrine government regulation of political speech Australian_constitutional_law |
gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
upheld the law |
gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:Australian_Capital_Television_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales gptkb:Unions_NSW_v_New_South_Wales |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|