Statements (53)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 40)
|
gptkbp:impact |
affected legal interpretations of free speech
contributed to debates on electoral reform influenced political campaign regulations raised awareness of political funding issues shaped public policy on donations |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of expression
freedom of political communication constitutionality of electoral funding laws public interest in political communication regulation of political donations |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
transparency in political donations
judicial review of legislation balance between regulation and freedom public trust in electoral processes case law on political donations challenges to electoral integrity constitutional protections for political speech evolution of political communication rights government accountability in political funding historical context of electoral laws impact of judicial decisions on legislation impact of money in politics judicial interpretation of political rights legislative intent in electoral laws political communication doctrine political rights of individuals regulatory challenges in political funding regulatory framework for elections relationship between law and democracy rights of citizens in elections role of the judiciary in electoral matters interpretation_of_the_Constitution Australian_constitutional_law role_of_the_High_Court_in_electoral_matters |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
[2015] HCA 34
(2015) 256 CLR 178 |
gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the validity of laws
|
gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Unions_NSW_v._New_South_Wales
gptkb:Lange_v._Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation gptkb:Australian_Capital_Territory_v._Commonwealth |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|