Statements (58)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law case
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
gptkbp:doctrine |
implied rights
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 4)
|
gptkbp:impact |
political advertising regulations
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Patrick_Keane
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Gageler gptkb:Justice_Michelle_Gordon gptkb:Chief_Justice_Robert_French gptkb:Justice_Virginia_Bell gptkb:Justice_Susan_Kiefel unanimous decision |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
constitutionality of laws
freedom of political communication |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
represented by barristers
represented by solicitors |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
Australian_constitutional_law
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
freedom of expression
political participation democratic_process |
gptkbp:outcome |
judgment delivered
appeal dismissed legal precedent set upheld the law legal principles clarified legal standards established judicial review conducted law upheld decision published regulatory framework established constitutional interpretation refined constitutional law enriched constitutional safeguards highlighted constitutional validity confirmed democratic values upheld electoral integrity maintained freedom of speech affirmed judicial authority reinforced judicial independence emphasized judicial reasoning articulated legal clarity provided legal discourse advanced legal framework analyzed legal precedents referenced political communication protected political rights recognized public interest considered public policy implications discussed |
gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:Australian_Capital_Television_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth gptkb:Unions_NSW_v_New_South_Wales |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|