Statements (36)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil rights
administrative law public law election law constitutional challenge political law |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 39)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
public interest
freedom of speech election laws political advertising regulations democratic_process |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J unanimous Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
proportionality test
freedom of political communication |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
represented by barristers
represented by solicitors |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Australian_constitutional_law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the law
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
in_Australian_law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case
|